The other day, we opted to rent a John Deere machine as all the Volvo ones were already in use. This brand new machine was similar in size to the Volvo we had in mind. One unique feature of the John Deere was its keyless entry - you simply entered a code to start it. Additionally, it had a built-in TV screen connected to a camera at the back, allowing you to easily track your movements. While I enjoyed using it, I couldn't help but wonder how it would hold up after thousands of hours of hard work. It truly felt like operating the bridge of a spaceship with all its flashy lights and buttons.
95zIV expressed his dissatisfaction with Volvo loaders, stating that he was relieved to see them returned to the dealer. He has experience operating various models from a 70 up to a 330, but found them lacking compared to Kawasaki loaders in the quarry. Both he and his colleagues shared the same opinion, noting that the Volvo cabs were loud and lacked power. In his view, Volvo loaders do not meet the standards set by other manufacturers. However, he did appreciate the heated seat feature on the 70 model. Additionally, he questioned the loud cabs on models older than 1990 and speculated about the quality differences between Volvo loaders in Sweden and the US.
I occasionally operate a loader at work when the regular operator is not around. The cab is comfortable and I appreciate the layout, especially the convenient floor switch for heavy digging tasks. However, the loader has low hours, lacks down pressure, and would be expensive to repair, which the company is not willing to do. The ride can be rough for a loader of its size and age, and I wish it had more lifting power. On the bright side, the parking brake switch is hard to find, leading to some amusing moments with coworkers. Despite its flaws, I am still a fan of Deere equipment.
Without a doubt, my favorite loader by far. Outperforms a caterpillar all day, every day.
When it comes to loaders in the UK, Volvo and CAT are among the top choices for quarry and sand pit operations. Both brands are known for their reliability and high-quality equipment, with excellent parts and customer support. While John Deere equipment is not as prevalent in the UK market, Komatsu also offers great loaders despite potential issues with backup support and parts cost. However, the reliability and value of Volvo and CAT loaders make them preferred choices in the UK.
I have a group of friends who are loyal Volvo loader users and have been operating them for years with great satisfaction. While Volvo loaders may not be as common in our state compared to Cat and Komatsu, I am open to the idea of owning one myself. Our primary loaders are Komatsu, and we have had a positive experience with them overall, despite some issues with backup support. It's worth noting that rust is a concern for us, even in our dry climate, as our Komatsu loaders are showing signs of rust around the cab windows.
As Rocksn' Roses pointed out, rusting is a major issue with the Komatsu kit compared to Volvo equipment. Volvo excels in painting their machinery, resulting in a minimal risk of rust and maintaining a sleek appearance even after years of use in quarries. The dump-truck skips of Volvo are designed with smooth sides and no ribs, preventing the formation of rust pockets. Transitioning from driving a CAT to a Volvo requires some adjustment due to the different layout. Volvo machines are built to withstand harsh conditions, such as freezing temperatures, and are known for their durability and reliability, even if they may not be the fastest shovels. With rising fuel costs in the UK, Volvo engines stand out for their fuel efficiency.
In this area, there is a strong preference for the reliable old Michigans. Even after Volvo acquired them, people continued to purchase and use them, with many positive reviews circulating. It's rare to see a Michigan broken down or abandoned in a scrapyard. However, some individuals do favor Caterpillars and John Deeres, both of which hold up well in various conditions. While Kummagatsus are less common in this region, the Suzio-York Hill quarry boasts an enormous WA900 and an impressive old Clark-Michigan 475.
According to contractors, Volvos and Caterpillars come from two different worlds. While Volvo is currently ranked #3 globally and dominates the market, the domestic sector is still important. Operators in the industry demand top-of-the-line cabs, and companies are willing to invest in quality equipment to avoid costly sick leave scenarios. With hydraulic quick couplers and extra functions becoming standard, businesses are realizing the value of efficient machines in saving labor costs. Machines are also expected to operate in extreme conditions, such as temperatures as low as -20C, commonly seen in snow clearing and material spreading tasks.
Within the timber industry, Volvo and local brand Ljungby have a stronghold in handling operations at sawmills and paper mills. Despite attempts by some mills to introduce Caterpillars for specific tasks, issues arose due to the machines not being able to handle the workload. It was not that Caterpillars are inferior, but rather they were not utilized in the same manner as Volvo or Ljungby equipment. Perhaps a different configuration of the lifting equipment could have made the Caterpillars suitable for timber handling.
Similar challenges may be faced in American quarries, where operators are accustomed to using Caterpillar machinery. Transitioning to a Volvo may require a different approach to achieve optimal performance and efficiency.
According to MKTEF, Volvo is at the forefront of the wheel loader market, with other brands closely watching and emulating their innovations. Although competitors may not openly admit it, in private conversations they acknowledge that Volvo is the top choice for loaders. Many industry professionals have discussed this at major trade shows. When comparing loaders of similar sizes, a test run will easily demonstrate why Volvo is considered the best. As mentioned by reddot556, operators greatly appreciate Volvo loaders. The new F models come equipped with electro hydraulics, which may require some time for operators to adjust to. However, after a few hours of use and proper adjustment of the bucket leveling system, operators will easily achieve precise leveling. Overall, Volvo loaders are highly regarded for their performance and reliability. Additionally, Volvo's engines are known for their quality. Despite some initial adjustment to the Elec-Hydro controls, Volvo loaders are considered top-notch by those in the industry. In addition to loaders, Volvo is also leading the competition in the ADT segment.
According to MKTEF, Volvo is leading the market in wheel loaders, with other brands closely following their innovative designs. Despite not publicly acknowledging it, competitors privately recognize Volvo as the top brand in loaders. Feedback from operators at major fairs confirms that Volvo loaders are preferred for their performance. The new F models feature electro hydraulics, which may require some time to adjust to, but once operators are familiar with the system, they can achieve precise leveling. Operators who have experience with Cat, Komatsu, Kawasaki, and Volvo loaders in the 2 to 4.4 yd range consistently choose Volvo as their preferred brand. Volvo loaders are praised for their power, spacious and quiet cabs, and overall reliability compared to other brands like Komatsu. While the 'E' series impressed with its improvements over previous models, not much is known about the performance of the 'F' series loaders.
I may not have extensive experience with loaders, but every Volvo loader I've operated has consistently impressed me. It's no surprise to see Volvo loaders being favored by many highway departments and quarry companies. The durability of its paint exceeds expectations, and after a long day of work, I always feel more comfortable in a Volvo. Of course, we also have some quality Caterpillar and Komatsu loaders in our fleet. Ultimately, the performance of a loader depends on the skills of the operator and how well the machine is optimized for its specific task. It's not just about having a good loader, but having the right one for the job.
Adore Volvo. Adore Feline Companions.
I have dedicated countless hours operating L90D machines, which I found to be incredibly comfortable and powerful. These machines provided a smooth operation for my work at a compost/bark yard, involving stockpiling and truck loading throughout my shift.
I own a Volvo 4500 loader, which I believe is from around 1985. I purchased it about 15 years ago and it received new sleeves and pistons approximately 1000 hours ago. The loader is still running on its original transmission, final drives, and hydraulic pump despite heavy use. I am impressed with the performance of these loaders.
- 14-11-2024
- australian pete
reddot556 mentioned that they rented a John Deere recently because all the Volvo machines were in use. The rented machine was similar in size to the Volvo pictured and was brand new. The keyless entry and TV screen with a camera at the back made the experience enjoyable. However, the real test would be after a few thousand hours of hard work to see if everything still functions. The cab of the machine looked like something out of the Starship Enterprise with its flashy lights and buttons. The new K's are known for their advanced features, including keyless start and embedded payload scales as an option.
I am a big fan of the new K series equipment. I currently own a 2008 644J, but I can't help feeling envious of the newer models. One thing that disappoints me about the latest Volvo machines is that they don't seem to have changed much from the older models. Our Michigan loaders from the 1980s look very similar to the current ones. It may be time for a significant update in the design of these machines.
In our workshop, we have a 330 machine that generally operates smoothly, but unfortunately experiences frequent breakdowns. During a usage in the summer, I noticed the heated seats turning on without my command. After removing the fuse and resolving the issue, the next day the automatic greaser malfunctioned. The mechanics were called, and upon inspection, it was discovered that the heated seats and greaser shared a fuse. Despite the dealer's attempt to repair the issue, they had to resort to removing the seats, costing us $2,000 for a day of service interruption. On another occasion, my boss jokingly referred to 988 cats, as I have a passion for equipment knowledge.
I strongly disagree with those who dislike Volvo machinery. I have operated Volvo L120 and L150E wheel loaders with grapples and solid rubber tires, and I have found them to be impressive. However, I do have a personal dislike for Liebherr wheel loaders due to the hydrostatic transmissions. In my experience, the options on the Volvos I have operated have performed adequately, even though we often push them beyond the manufacturer's recommended limits. Overall, I have no complaints about their performance.
I don't have a strong dislike for them, but as they say, when life gives you lemons, you make lemonade. We have a 150 and 90 model which are reliable, along with two 220 models. One of them functions well, while the newer one is somewhat subpar. Unfortunately, the 330 model is not up to par and is considered junk.
I am a newcomer to this forum with nearly 2 years of experience operating heavy equipment. I have operated Cat and Volvo loaders, with a preference for the L120 model. Working for a small contractor with projects across the western region of the state, we often find our coveted L120 being taken by others. However, when we do have it in our possession, we make sure to make the most of it. In the upcoming weeks, I am excited to have the opportunity to continuously operate the L120 for tasks such as loading a pug mill and stockpiling materials. I have never encountered issues with bucket retrieval and believe that mastering the intricacies of the machine is key to maximizing its efficiency. This principle applies to all loaders in general.
Operating a Volvo L150E in a sand quarry to feed a washplant has been a game-changer for me. This machine is not only incredibly comfortable to operate, but it also outperforms a brand new Hyundai 770-7A in every aspect. With an impressive 14,000 hours on the clock, the Volvo L150E truly stands out as the superior choice for heavy-duty operations.
Presenting the Stunning Beauty...
User catd8t mentioned that while they don't hate them, they prefer the newer models of equipment. They have had positive experiences with the 150 and 90, as well as two 220s. One of the 220s runs smoothly, but the newer one is not as good, and the 330 is not up to par. The L350F has replaced the L330s in recent years after extensive development and testing. Significant improvements have been made in every aspect of the equipment. It might be beneficial to research the changes made in the newer models for further information.
In my view, Volvo loaders do not hold much value. That's my take on it.
In 2002, we made the switch from Caterpillar to Volvo for our equipment fleet. From L70 to 220 models, including both C and E series, we have found the Volvo machines to be superior in power and speed. While Caterpillar excels in versatility for various applications like dozing and pushing, Volvo outshines in loading trucks and material handling with fuel efficiency. We also have a couple of Hyundai machines in our fleet, although they have proven to be unreliable.
We currently have a fleet of 4 Volvo loaders, one of which has accumulated an impressive 23,000 operating hours without requiring any significant repairs. This loader continues to perform reliably and efficiently, showcasing the durability and longevity of Volvo equipment.
I have been operating a Volvo L90 loader and experiencing frequent engine failures from 2008 to 2010. The overheating of the middle cylinders leading to piston failure is a common issue, often attributed to a failing oil cooling jet system. Have others faced this problem as well and what are the recommended solutions for this issue?
To ensure optimal performance, it is important to regularly check the oil filter head valves for correct positioning, which are color-coded for easy identification. Blockage of the spray jets, typically caused by excessive use of instant gasket by mechanics during service work, can affect the bypass side that feeds the spray jets. Other common reasons for blockage or damage to the spray jets include inadequate oil changes or physical damage. It is recommended to consult the service manual for maintenance guidelines. Volvo engines are known for their reliability and quality.
The Evolution of Construction Machinery: Volvo Leads the Way
Volvo enthusiasts are onto something - Volvo is setting the pace in the industry. Just take a look at the innovative K-series Cat as an example. Rumor has it that a former Volvo employee from Sweden played a key role in its development. But of course, not all Volvos perform at their best, just like with Cat, Komatsus, and other brands. Some models excel while others fall short - that's just how it goes in the competitive construction machinery world.
Volvo has been a leader in the industry for many years. Although I may not be an expert, Volvo machines from the 70's and 90's are known for being well-equipped, quiet, reliable, comfortable, and efficient. Despite some drawbacks such as high parts prices and issues with paintwork on C and D models and ignition switches, Volvo machines are highly regarded in this region for their quality and have maintained this reputation for over three decades. Are loaders from Johndeere manufactured in-house?