Do you know the year of those 435's in Colorado? It's incredible to see them with 5000 hours on them without any major breakdowns.
I have been using a 430 for the past 3 years and have not experienced any issues. It's been a fantastic mini device in terms of reliability and performance.
Issues with loose cylinder nuts and broken rods have been observed in both older and newer models of the crowd cylinder. This seems to be a random occurrence, as not all machines are affected. The problem stems from rods with improperly cut threads from the factory, leading to them working loose and breaking. Despite this issue, these machines are still known for their strong digging capabilities.
- 24-09-2024
- bobcatmechanic
I own a 2005 model with 5000 operating hours and a 2007 model with 1500 operating hours. Both machines are in excellent condition, with no issues regarding the engine or hydraulics - just regular filter changes. The older machine has undergone a few repairs on the boom, but they both offer impressive speed and performance as they are fast tracks. As far as I am aware, the Tak. 53 does not come equipped with a turbo.
- 25-09-2024
- Colorado Digger
I've decided on a purchase and I'm confident it will bring me satisfaction. Excited for what's to come! Thank you!
I currently own a 2005 model and am extremely satisfied with its dependable performance. With 1500 hours logged, I have experienced no issues with any of the key components. It's encouraging to hear from others who have accumulated a high number of hours with similar results. I also want to echo the advantages of utilizing the fast track system. - Scott
I recently experienced a frustrating situation with my Bobcat excavator. Despite having 4 Bobcat machines and investing in uptime protection software, the warranty was not honored when the motor on my 337 model failed at 680 hours. As a loyal customer with over 12 Bobcats, this experience has made me hesitant to purchase another machine from them. It's important for companies to take care of their valued customers to maintain loyalty and trust.
I recently discovered this website, so I apologize for the delayed information. Before you made your purchase, I wish I could have warned you about my experience with my '06 435 Bobcat. With approximately 2000 hours on it, I am highly dissatisfied with its durability. I have encountered numerous issues with both of my Bobcats - the A300 and the 435 ZHS. Additionally, the dealer's customer service has been subpar. Whenever I report a problem, they offer little assistance and insist on me bringing the machine in for inspection. They claim to have never encountered the problems I am facing with my machines.
Some of the problems I have experienced include the machine bogging down in Fasttrack mode, a faulty swing break piston seal, and a blown swing ram causing significant damage. Despite my extensive experience operating heavy equipment for over 25 years, I have never encountered such issues with my other machinery, such as my 12,000-hour Cat 416C tractor. The durability of the Bobcat machinery is not up to par with industry standards, and I am extremely dissatisfied with its performance.
Do you have a trusted dealer for heavy equipment down south? Our preferred dealer is Bobcat of the Rockies, they offer top-notch service. It's a shame you're experiencing issues, but I've heard great things about the 300 series. Our 2007 435 model works like a dream, I doubt the digging conditions are any tougher there compared to here. We also use head shakers, hammers, and 36" buckets for loading. Everyone has their own preference, but I'll choose a Bobcat over a CAT any day.
- 25-09-2024
- Colorado Digger
I received my new purchase just yesterday. It's unfortunate to hear about some experiencing issues. Thankfully, my dealer has always provided excellent service.
In Colorado, Bobcat of Durango (formerly LBJ Equipment) was initially attentive to my needs, offering loaner machines during warranty repairs. However, I have become dissatisfied with their repair services, particularly regarding hydraulic coupler issues. Despite attempts to fix the coupler, it continued to leak, leading to a costly replacement recommendation. Skeptical of their diagnosis, I sought a second opinion from a local hydraulic repair shop, which successfully repaired the coupler without issue. This experience is just one of many reasons why I have lost confidence in the local Bobcat dealer.
Another incident involved a mysterious loud bang while my 435 machine was idle, prompting a search for the source. A broken bolt was eventually found in the track tensioner assembly, with the dealer insisting on an expensive assembly replacement. However, knowing the functionality of the tensioner, I opted to forego the costly replacement and instead continue using the machine without issue. Despite the dealer's warnings about the dangers of compressing the spring for repairs, I remain unconvinced of the necessity for a full assembly replacement. My experiences with the dealer contrast with the reliability and expertise I have found at my local Cat dealer, where experienced mechanics provide valuable insights and assistance. While not all Bobcat dealers may exhibit the same issues, my firsthand experiences in California and Colorado have highlighted the challenges I have encountered in both regions.
Colorado Digger expressed a preference for Bobcats over traditional cats, emphasizing their superior performance. While some may have positive experiences with their Bobcats, unfortunately, the same cannot be said for everyone. Despite encountering various issues, the A300 model stands out for its ability to grade while turning, maintain traction, and preserve tire integrity, lasting up to 1900 hours. Although it may come with its fair share of problems, the A300 outperforms the 435 model. However, the high cost of Bobcats, similar to tracked units, and the lack of availability in yellow may deter potential buyers. While wishing other Bobcat owners success, the writer personally will not consider purchasing a Bobcat again due to past difficulties.
Our 2006 435 excavator has approximately 1035 hours of usage. We encountered some cylinder problems that were not satisfactory to us, but the dealer assisted with repairs. Despite using hammers extensively, including a Hammerhead breaker, we acknowledge that the issues were not solely due to defects in the cylinders. Equipped with a 36" bucket and thumb, we effectively pick up large pieces of concrete debris without compromising on capacity compared to our previous 341 model. Overall, we are highly satisfied with our excavator performance.
DGODGR expressed satisfaction in hearing about positive experiences with Bobcats and the dealer. While they have encountered several problems, they appreciate the functionality of the A300 model. Despite issues, such as costs and color availability, they acknowledge the machine's key features such as grading while turning and traction maintenance.
It is suggested to escalate concerns to higher levels within the Bobcat organization, as representatives may provide solutions, as seen in experiences with CAT representatives. Despite personal issues with Bobcats, the dealer's support has been commendable. With a history of owning multiple machines, it is emphasized that dealer communication is crucial for resolving problems effectively.
As a novice operator looking to expand my repertoire of machinery, I recently acquired a Bobcat mini excavator (430). Reflecting on my purchase, I now realize the value in researching beforehand. Prior to this, I had experience with a Kubota L35 TLB, which served its purpose but pales in comparison to the versatility of a mini excavator for most excavation projects. The moment I borrowed a neighbor's mini excavator to clear 1000 feet of ditch line, I was smitten with its efficiency.
Regrettably, I made a couple of missteps during the buying process. First, I opted for a used rental machine with 1900 hours on it. Despite being assured by a friend who owned the rental company that the equipment was diligently maintained by expert mechanics, I should have exercised more caution. Second, upon delivery, I noticed some issues which I naively believed to be minor and easily repairable.
In hindsight, the lesson learned is to thoroughly research and, if possible, bring along a knowledgeable mechanic or operator to inspect the machinery before committing to a purchase. This is not meant to discredit Bobcat, as the unit has proven to be efficient with 300 hours of use. However, I wish I had conducted more due diligence prior to buying.
Are you looking for a reliable and efficient 4 435's ZHS fast track excavator? We currently have a variety available, including one 07 model, two 08 models, and one 09 model. These machines have varying hours ranging from 100 to 2800 hours but are all in excellent condition. While there has been a minor issue with the Dipper arm main pivot bolt coming loose, it is easily checked and resolved. These excavators perform exceptionally well, digging quickly and efficiently thanks to their faultless Kubota motors.
I am delighted to hear that. The bolt on my equipment tends to loosen, but as you mentioned, it is a simple issue to address. Check out more maintenance tips on the Heavy Equipment Forums! Cheers!
If you are facing issues with your Bobcat equipment, consider escalating the problem to higher levels such as the district Bobcat representative, regional representative, and even the factory representative. They have the authority to address your concerns and provide a resolution, even if it means sending someone from the main office in Gwinner. In a similar situation with CAT, I had representatives come down from North Carolina to assist with problems I encountered with a 272c skid steer. It may require some persistence, but raising your concerns can lead to a satisfactory outcome.
I have interacted with the Bobcat representative in the past after completing a survey following warranty repairs. I highlighted the disparity between the number of hours my Bobcat machines (435: 800 hrs; A300: 600 hrs) spent in the shop compared to my CAT tractors (416C: 11,000 hrs; 315CL: 3,000 hrs) on a 20:1 ratio basis. Despite not keeping a precise count, the difference in maintenance needs was significant, especially considering the Cat machines had ten times more operating hours. Dealing with frequent warranty issues with the Bobcats caused inconvenience in moving equipment to the dealership and adapting to loaner units during repairs.
Although the dealer provided temporary replacements during the warranty period, the constant switch between machines with different features added complexity to our operations. It can be frustrating to continuously address issues with machinery and I have reached a point of exhaustion in dealing with these challenges. While the manufacturer's representative may be unaware of recent problems with the 435 and A300 models, it is essential to communicate these issues to facilitate improvements in product quality.
At times, frustrations may escalate, leading to venting and seeking solutions from higher authorities. It is important to advocate for quality products and hold manufacturers accountable for delivering reliable equipment. Consider reaching out to your dealer representative, such as Clayton, to discuss past events and seek a resolution moving forward.
It is advisable to create a detailed timeline of events related to your warranty repairs. Take your time with this process and start by jotting down what you remember, then add details as they come to you. Make sure to keep copies of all documentation, including invoices for repairs done after the warranty expired. Once you are satisfied with your evidence, schedule a meeting with your representative to discuss the matter further.
Hey, have you sold your 435 yet? I believe I have it now and I'm working on fixing it. The RAM is leaking and blowing seals, causing it to bog down. I had my first 435 stolen, so I had to get another one. The first one was great with no issues at all, but this one is giving me trouble. I can't afford another one right now, otherwise, this one would be gone and I would have a different one. If you contact Max about the issues, it could help resolve them.
- 25-09-2024
- hprenovation97
I realize that I am a few years behind the trend.
- 25-09-2024
- hprenovation97
In a recent update, hprenovation97 provided an insightful overview of their Bobcats, including an A300 and a 435 ZHS, both 2006 models. Despite clocking in around 3,700 hours on the 435 and 3,400 on the A300, hprenovation97 shared positive feedback on the track life, emphasizing that they've had more luck than with other similar models. A recent repair involved track replacement, with previous fixes including welding near the dipper mounts – a common issue among this equipment. While contemplating resealing the blade rams, financial concerns have put a temporary hold on this maintenance task. Additionally, a comparison with a friend's Cat 305 mini excavator revealed a preference for their own machine, particularly noting the worn tracks on the Cat 305.